  | 
          
            | 
         
        
          | Comparison of holotype of
          Taxus kingstonii with illustration 
          reproduced from
        H-l. Li., Woody flora of Taiwan, Fig. 2 (1963). | 
         
       
      13.
        Taxus kingstonii Spjut 
        , J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 1(1): 240. 2007. 
        Type: China. Taiwan: Arisan Prov., Kagi, 2833 m [Mt. Alishan], 2
        Feb 1918, tree 25 ft. x 2 ft., only one seen, Wilson 9738,
        holotype: A! (with male cones; leaf with 10–11 stomata rows/band,
        abaxial margin with 8 smooth, thick-walled, trapezoidal cells across,
        anticlinal to periclinal in arrangement, followed by 5 rows of papillose
        cells, midrib 12 cells wide, mostly smooth, papillose on outer 2 rows);
        isotypes: BM! (leaf with 13 stomata rows and 9 marginal smooth cells,
        midrib mostly smooth except upper third of leaf, papillose on outer 2
        rows of cells), K! US (p.p.)! 
        Kingston yew.
        Forest margins, or summits, 2450-2833 m in Taiwan, to 800 m on mainland
        Asia; India (Khasi Hills), Myanmar, China (Tibet, Gansu, Shaanxi,
        Sichuan, Yunnan, Taiwan).  
         Shrub
        or tree to 12 m
        high, bole to 65 cm diam; branchlets unequally (type) to equally
        divided, yellowish green and gradually becoming yellowish with tint of
        either red, orange or brown; bud scales mostly persistent, 3–4
        seriate, turgid, ovate, concave, carinate near apex on upper scales, tan
        to chestnut brown, lower bud-scales ca. 1.5 mm long. Leaves rigid,
        spreading usually at less than right angles to branchlets, not parallel
        to one another, more evenly tapered to base and apex than in T. mairei,
        lanceolate, narrowly elliptical to oblong (type), or linear in other
        morphs, evenly tapered to an acute, sharply pointed apex,
        recurved and/or twisted downwards, 1.5–2.5 cm long, 3.0–3.5 mm
        wide, 0.35–0.50 mm thick, dark green and convex above to rounded
        midrib, the adaxial midrib somewhat acute in lower half, often not
        evident near apex, paler green to yellowish-green and convex below, or
        plane to concave below to rounded or flush midrib, often with orange
        tint in the herbarium, or dull rusty brown in the herbarium, thickened
        and liplike near margins, or plane and slightly revolute near margins;
        upper (adaxial) epidermal cells in T-sect. wider than tall, nearly wide
        rectangular or ellipitical in T-sect., usually 20–25 um tall and
        25–30 um wide, thin-walled, slightly inflated; lower (abaxial)
        epidermal cells similar in T-sect. but not as large, 15–25 um tall,
        20–30 um wide, slightly inflated near margin in 2–5 rows, more
        nearly rectangular in 7–11 cell rows near stomata bands, usually
        relatively short on midrib, 1–4 (-10)× l/w, sharply 4–6 angled,
        often wider and more slanted at one end (trapezoidal), not inflated (in
        T-sect) as in T. mairei, papillose to ca. (7-) 8–12 (-19) rows
        of cells from margins, typically without papillae on midrib (except
        young leaves), or partially papillose on outer midrib; papillae
        submarginal to medial in 2–3 irregular rows across each cell. Stomata
        bands broader than the non-stomatal region, olive green in fresh
        material; yellowish orange in dried leaves; stomata continuous in
        11–15 rows, separated by 1–2 rows of accessory cells, stoma often
        with a blackish halo. Male cone scales generally 4-seriate, globose, ca.
        4 mm diam, yellowish-green, pollen sacs mostly 6, pale pink with reddish
        mid region and patchy resinous areas. Female cone in bud subcylindric,
        ca. 2 mm long, greenish, scales mostly 5-seriate, conduplicate at base,
        maturing on 1st yr branchlets; seeds ovoid, dull, tan or
        purplish, stained by aril, angular where tapering to apex, or not
        angled, to 7 mm long, 4 mm wide.
         
        
             Taxus kingstonii is recognized by the relatively turgid recurved
        leaves (twist and curve downwards along their blades) that taper rather
        evenly to apex, and by the rusty orange color on the abaxial leaf
        surface (dried specimens).  In
        herbarium specimens, the leaves often crisscross, especially near apex
        of branchlets, whereas leaves in other species of the Sumatrana
        Group—that are reddish or greenish in color—appear more evenly
        two-ranked and tightly adpressed to branchlets. 
        These differences seem related to the manner in which leaves
        twist, which may also correlate with leaf shape as seen by the evenly
        tapered leaf in the Kingston yew compared to the falcate leaf in other
        species (indented more along lower margin near petiole; Fig. 20, 21, 30,
        31). 
             Other features that help
        distinguish the Kingston yew are seen on the abaxial leaf midrib (note: 
        27 June  2006—as seen mostly from specimens from Khasia, Tibet, 
        Gansu, Sichuan, and Taiwan, but not in some specimens from Yunnan). 
        It usually forms a rounded keel, in contrast to a truncated ridge that
        may either be flush with the surface in T. celebica, or elevated
        in T. mairei.  Its
        epidermal cells are short trapezoidal to almost rectangular, and in
        T-section appear similar in size and shape to those on the adaxial
        surface, or the adaxial cells sometimes are larger and nearly
        isodiametric.  Taxus
        mairei, on the other hand, has shorter trapezoidal cells on its
        abaxial midrib, but in T-section they appear larger and nearly globose—in
        contrast with the shorter elliptical cells on the adaxial surface. 
        The abaxial midribs of the related T. sumatrana and T.
        celebica have longer, nearly rectangular cells that in T-section are
        similar in size on both surfaces. 
             The
        Kingston yew also has conspicuous persistent bud-scales at the base of
        young branchlets, in contrast to those of related species in the Sumatrana
        Group that appear vestigial as in T. chinensis.   
             The Kingston yew generally
        occurs at elevations between that of T. mairei (below 1200 m) and
        that of T. wallichiana (above 2300 m). 
        Variation ascribed to T. kingstonii may include hybrids
        with T. chinensis and T. mairei in Shaanzi, Gansu and
        Sichuan, T. celebica in Yunnan and Burma, and T. wallichiana
        in NE India.  These alleged
        hybrids, however, show disjunct geographical relationships as further
        described in the examples that follow. 
             (A) Four collections, two from Shaanxi, one from
        Gansu, and another from Sichuan that I had annotated T. chinensis without
        microscopic examination of leaves, were later found to lack papillae on
        the abaxial midrib, a feature that I employ to distinguish T.
        chinensis from T. kingstonii. 
        Their leaves spread nearly at right angles—parallel to each
        other—and have the greenish color of T. chinensis; otherwise,
        they compare favorably with typical T. kingstonii.  The
        close morphological similarity among these specimens, along with their
        more northern geographical occurrence, suggests a distinct taxon.
         
              (B) Two collections, one from Taiwan (Liu et al.
        389) and one from Yunnan (Forrest 12087), resemble T.
        mairei by the isodichotomous branching, leaves spreading at right
        angles, and by the thin-walled leaf epidermal cells with a yellowish
        chloroplast, but are regarded T. kingstonii by the rusty orange
        color on leaves and branchlets, and by the leaves ± evenly tapered to
        base and apex.  The abaxial
        leaf epidermal cells in the specimen from Yunnan are not enlarged on the
        midrib—further supporting its determination as T. kingstonii,
        whereas the Taiwan specimen has slightly larger cells—indicating that
        it could be assigned to T. mairei. 
        Yet, the closer similarity between these specimens than to other
        specimens indicates a common but distinct ancestry.
         
              (C) Collections from Yunnan (Forrest 11789, 15945,
        Forrest s.n. A), Khasia (Hooker 77 P, Hooker 137 P,
        Hooker & Thomson s.n. yr 1855 P) and from Taiwan (C-j.
        Chang 1–6, without specific locality) resemble T.
        celebica or T. sumatrana by the acuminate tapered leaf but
        are referred to T. kingstonii by the leaves spreading obliquely
        (Fig. 18), tapering evenly to base, having a uniformly rusty orange
        color on the abaxial surface, and having short trapezoidal epidermal
        cells on the abaxial midrib that in T-section are not larger than those
        on the adaxial surface.  On
        one hand, these specimens have much in common to indicate they belong to
        a distinct taxon while on the other hand specimens from Khasia (Mann
        s.n. P, Fig. 19) appear intermediate to T. wallichiana by the
        thicker glossy leaves, or belong to T. sumatrana, distinguished
        by the thinner puckered leaves (Mann s.n., “10 ft
        high”—annotated Cephalotaxus mannii, GH, Taxus baccata,
        A).  The Yunnan specimens
        have relatively thin leaves, a character trait that may have been
        acquired by hybridization with T. celebica (or T. sumatrana). 
        Thus, the Yunnan and Khasia plants of the Kingston yew could also
        be polyphyletic.
         
              The shape of the leaf
        epidermal cells on the abaxial surface also helps separate T.
        kingstonii from the T. chinensis species complex (T.
        aff. chinensis in Appendix; T. phytonii Spjut ined.; T.
        phytonii var. obscura Spjut ined, in adnot. A, GH, K, P, U),
        particularly T. obscura ined. as defined in the preceding key. 
        Specimens of this species complex from Luzon and Taiwan are
        remarkably similar to T. kingstonii in their leaf characteristics
        of color and arrangement, but differ in more papillose cells on midrib
        and marginal zones—occurring to within (8-) 4 (-2) cells from the
        margins.  Occasional
        specimens from Luzon (Sulit 2350, Alvarey 18369
        from Benquet Mt.), Fujian (Chung 3866) and Thailand (Lobb 461)
        with fewer papillose cells—lacking across 8 marginal cells and often
        on the lower half of the midrib—may be hybrids between T. obscura
        (ined.) and T. kingstonii. They were identified T. kingstonii
        in my 1996 annotations, but considered T. obscura (ined.) in this
        paper by the fusiform shape of the epidermal cells on the abaxial
        surface of leaves.
         
             On the other hand a more
        conservative treatment might include the Philippine yews (T. obscura
        ined.) under T. kingstonii based on leaf arrangement and color, a
        character that I had applied to a limited extent that resulted in other
        Philippine specimens being included under T. kingstonii in my
        1996 annotations (e.g., Leano 25128). 
        This, however, seems contrary to leaf anatomical data in this
        study.  The relatively
        narrow border of bare marginal cells (4 cells wide), the papillose
        midrib, and the 11–14 stomata rows/band occur consistently in many
        specimens that would seem to merit separate taxonomic status. 
        It is also interesting that Ludlow & Sherriff 3719
        from NE India has similarly discolored leaf surfaces with elliptical
        shaped epidermal cells in T-section, 12 stomata rows/band, and a
        papillose undersurface that extends entirely across the reddish marginal
        zone, and that Tsai 59874 from Yunnan, and that Neth. Ind. For. Serv.
        bb:20887 from Sulawesi, are also similar in this regard. Their leaf
        characteristics compare more with The Philippines yews than with
        those in the Himalayas.  Further
        study is needed to determine to what extent epidermal papillae are
        influenced by genetic and environmental factors. 
             Taxus kingstonii is
        named in honor of David G. I. Kingston, a chemist who has done extensive
        work on elucidating and summarizing the taxane chemistry of the genus 
		(e.g., Kingston 1996; Kingston et al. 1990. 
        Taxol, from which the drug paclitaxel is marketed and used to
        treat ovarian and other cancers, was originally isolated from dried bark
        of T. brevifolia; however, fresh leaves of many species of Taxus
        have proved suitable for obtaining taxanes. 
        Taxol was first characterized by Monroe Wall’s group (Research
        Triangle Institute, Wani et al. 1971). 
        They also discovered other significant antitumor agents such as
        camptothecin and holacanthone (Wall et al. 1972). 
        Representative Specimens—India:
        Khasia, Hooker L77 (PH), 1337 (K) Simmons 484 (P),
        Nungluai, 5000 ft, Mann (K, P). Myanmar: Bernardmyo, Ruby
        Mines, 5600 ft (K). China—Tibet: Oriental, Haut Mekong,
        Tsekou to Nekou, Soulie1411 (P: 2 sheets). Gansu: F. N.
        Meyer 1790 ex USDA (P). Shaanxi (Shensi) Davis 1872
        (P). Tsin-lin au  Lao-lin,
        3000 m.  Sichuan:
        Tachienlu Cheng 1001 (BM), Cheng 1475 (P). Yunnan:
        Shweli-Salween Divide, 10,000 ft, 25º20 N, shrub 10–20 ft, open shady
        thickets, Forrest 11789 (BM, K), Salween, Forrest 12087
        (K, S: C-2093), Forrest s.n. (A); Ma-Chang-Kai, valley, 25º30 N,
        6000 ft., shrub, 20–30 ft., in thickets, Dec 1918, Forrest 9462
        (A, K), Forrest 15945 (BM, K); Salween E of Tengyueh, to summit
        of Shwell, Shwelli River, Rock 7587 (US). 
        Taiwan: Paseian San [Pahsienshan], Hsi 165 (PH); Fig.
        3 in Li, Woody Fl. Taiwan, Liu et al. 437, (M, T, US); Mt.
        Ammachan, Liu 0389 (A, K), Arizan, Nitak (PH); Mt. Ammashan,
        Taichung Hsien, C.C. Tseng s.n. (BH); Tongshi, C-j. Chang,
        Dongshi #2, Tongshi #6, without locality data, 4 Mar 1993 (wba). 
         |